That is not what I got out of that article. I took it as it will be easier to use adult stem cells than to continue to fight to use embryonic stem cells. Not that using adult stem cells is 'better' than using embryonic.
Basically, it seems to me the CA got sick of the fight and said we can do some good using the adult cells, even though embryonic cells are the better. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > You're new. > > "Adult stem cells are useless and people are dying in the streets > because embryonic stems cells were banned..." > > Those kind of discussions earned me the reputation of wanting people > to die just because they're not me. > > Turns out the immediate fix was adult cells all along. Maybe many > years from now embryonic stems cells will be fruitful, but for today > we can get results within a couple of years. > > - - - - > Disclaimer: This is a first draft. Do not hit reply with corrections. > Please send all grammar and spelling fixes to > [email protected] > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I don't think I see your point.. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306740 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
