I have no issues with using embryonic stem cells and have stated so in the past. I just presented the other side of the discussion. The fact that California has made available $3 billion and Obama has also allowed more funding proves it was bogus argument to begin with. I said years ago adult cells were ready and embryonic cells were years away. Youre saying throw money at it and they will work. Well even the people for emb cells realize it needs time not just money.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> In a tacit acknowledgment that the promise of human embryonic stem >> cells is still far in the future... >> > > Only if we are allowed to research and experiment with embryonic stem cells, > will their potential EVER be realized....whether that's tomorrow or 50 > years, what do you care? You don't want us to EVER realize their > potential...so suggesting that the "controversy" is put to bed just because > adult stem cells show more short-term promise...is disingenuous. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306754 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
