I can admit that it may be grasping, but that is how I interpreted the article.
It is also possible that my interpretation is accurate. If Bush had not blocked funding for using embryonic cells, who's to say that we would not be at the same point as adult cells? On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, I got to say you're grasping. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Lets show the entire paragraph to get it in context. >> >> 'In a tacit acknowledgment that the promise of human embryonic stem >> cells is still far in the future, Californias stem cell research >> program on Wednesday awarded grants intended to develop therapies >> using mainly other, less controversial cells.' >> >> I does not state why its far in the future. However, in the context of >> the ENTIRE paragraph, one could conclude that it is far in the future >> because of the controversy around using embryonic stem cells and not >> because they will not bear any fruitful discoveries. The controversy >> itself could be limiting the discoveries, not the cells. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:306757 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
