why preaching hatred and violence is the same regardless of who is doing the preaching. And why is it different if the person is a naturalized citizen or someone who was born on US soil. Preaching hatred and violence is the same.
As for McVeigh and the 9/11 culprits, the end result is not any different, innocent lives were taken. Terrorism is terrorism regardless of the source. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > LL wrote: >> >> so you are saying that its different if an American citizen preaches >> hatred and death towards Americans than if someone (not an American >> citizen) in the US is preaching the same. >> >> How? The end result is the same. The means are the same. >> >> For that matter what difference is there between Timothy McVeigh and >> the 9/11 culprits? >> >> Also is there a difference if the person who is preaching the hatred >> was born in the US or is a naturalized citizen? >> > > a.) Yes, it's different especially legally. > > b.) Religious extremist terrorism from foreign agents versus domestic > policy terrorism by citizens > > c.) yes, because it brings into question our citizenship process. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:307364 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
