On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Won Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> 1. Nike (so far) has pledged their support. I will agree they may have >> a right to know, but that does not translate into the whole world >> knowing. >> > > As an equity holder in Nike I demand to know why my money is being spent to > sponsor him. I demand details.
I am sure if you have that much equity in Nike, you will find out. > > >> >> 2. That is a risk you take with sporting events, especially golf >> tournaments. Any number of things could prohibit him from playing in >> any tournament, and none of them are any of our business, even if you >> bought a ticket because he was 'scheduled' to appear. >> >> > No one is writing that these risk do not exist. What I am trying to say is, > I want an explanation if he doesn't show up. You say it is none of our > business. I'm giving you a reason why it is my business. I paid money to > have a chance to see him play. He stated he is withdrawing due to "the > incident." I want to know what the incident was. Just saying it isn't my > business doesn't make it so. I'm telling you why it is my business. I want > a good reason why it isn't my business. You bought a ticket because he was scheduled to appear. Key word there is 'scheduled'. It was no guarantee that he would be there and that is why it is none of your business. -- Scott Stroz --------------- The DOM is retarded. http://xkc ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308774 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
