Howie- that's not the point.
As was said in another reply on this thread, I agree that if a lane is *added* to the road for HOV, then whether it's lightly or heavily used is up to the drivers - if they want a quicker trip, then car pool. But if an existing lane is converted to HOV, taking capacity off the road, to coerce single-occupant drivers into car pooling, then the lane should require 2 or more drivers. Only fair IMO. -Ben > Ever sit with an infant in traffic? It ain't fun. Give the mommies and daddies > a break... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "fluffy bananachunks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:37 PM > Subject: Re: HOV Lane Stuffs (was [Fw: Americans annoyed by "all this > International shit" on the Internet]) > > > > Howie Hamlin wrote: > > > > >Wow - that's harsh. Are you saying that kids aren't people? > > > > > > > > No, not that they aren't people, but that they aren't drivers. If the > > theory is that a kid gets yet another car out of the thru lanes, then > > allowing my dog would do the same... > > > > Geo > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
