We caught them lying multiple times in this report. Now we're supposed to believe it's all true except what ever else is found to be a lie? The boy that cried wolf ring a bell?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > so by your logic then anything published by the journal Nature or > Science is automatically invalid because once there were some invalid > data published in that data. > > In other words that's thorough crap. All it does is invalidate the > Himalayan data, it does not change one whit the data involving the > Arctic Ocean icecover melt, or the temperature data from the last 130 > years. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311113 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
