not good enough sam, you're still parroting talking points. Lets put it this way. In your analysis what are the specific points. Please support these with direct quotes from teh IPCC reports and cross referenced by journal articles that support your points.
Otherwise its just your bloviating and not thinking for yourself or merely parroting others points. not a good example of independent thought. On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here you go: > http://catallaxyfiles.com/2010/01/22/ipcc-and-peer-review/ > > We also know from the climategate emails that the data and models the > report uses was "modified" to hide the decline :) > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm referring to page number and paragraph sections of the report itself. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311130 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
