I'm referring to page number and paragraph sections of the report itself. On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > specifics please and just don't quote your bloviators. Otherwise how > else do we know you're not just blowing it out your ass. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> They used fake models. >> Modified temperature readings. >> Blocked dissent. >> Phony Glacier data and phony Africa drought reports. >> >> Why are you still supporting this? >> >> BTW, it was in the summary. >> >> Same standard? When politicians constantly lie to me I turn against >> them. So yes. >> >> Not so with you. You're like flies on shit with lying politicians. >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> multiple times. Perhaps in your mind. But other than the >>> misrepresentation of the Himalayan data, what other prevarications are >>> you talking about. At he most 1 page out of 3000. What other errors? >>> >>> You still have not answered my question, are you willing to apply the >>> same standard to the things you agree with. I rather doubt it frankly. >>> >> >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311122 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
