Nobody really understands the ever changing peer-review process: Phil Jones wrote "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sam you've demonstrated before time and time again in the past that > you have no understanding and relatively complete ignornace involving > the scientific and peer review processes. > > Science is not a political game, you have to have supporting data to > back up your hypotheses. The climate change deniers do not have the > data to support their claims, so they resort to the same tactics used > by the cretinists and others who follow faith or ideology based pseudo > science. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311301 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
