On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Scott Stewart
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> And now you're reading what you want to into what I said, I NEVER said
> climate change was bogus. There's a mountain of evidence just in the links
> that I posted, that says that man is influencing the climate on the planet
> and not in a good way.

When questioned about global warming, you quickly changed to pollution
is bad. That kind of redirect tells me you either admit there's no
real evidence of warming or you know the evidence is so week you need
to focus on another reason to curb people exhaust. So I pocked fun of
you, it's what I do :P

> Why are you trying to read into something that's not there? If you're trying
> to redirect you'll have to be better than that.
>
> There's not enough green space on the planet to offset the amount of CO2
> that man is shoving into the atmosphere. Not to mention methane and other
> gasses that can't be absorbed..

You just made that up out of thin air. I know for a fact you made that up.

> You're trying to use one report as the basis for a wholesale dismissal of
> climate change. That's bad science and logic.

So now you're having doubt about the entire report so you refer to all
the separate used by the report and confirmed by the publishing of the
report.
All controlled by a handful of scientist that got very rich from this
entire cycle.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311329
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to