On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Scott Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you implying: because this particular data set is bad, faked, etc. That > ALL the data from every source is bad, faked, etc. > > That's a mighty wide brush.
You seem to be missing that these data sets are used throughout most of the report. Jones, Mann and Hansen were controlling the peer review process for everything in the report. Don't pretend this is just one hockey stick graph, it's the entire group running the show. > NOAA, NASA, the EPA and others, while not taking a "the sky is falling" > approach are warning that we need to be aware and careful about what we're > throwing into the atmosphere. Why did you just change the scope of this discussion? So now you're saying climate change is bogus but we shouldn't pollute? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311323 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
