Did you even read the article that was linke to? If so, you need to work on your reading comprehension:
The university at the centre of the climate change row over stolen e-mails broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny. The University of East Anglia breached the Freedom of Information Act by refusing to comply with requests for data concerning claims by its scientists that man-made emissions were causing global warming. The Information Commissioners Office decided that UEA failed in its duties under the Act but said that it could not prosecute those involved because the complaint was made too late, The Times has learnt. The ICO is now seeking to change the law to allow prosecutions if a complaint is made more than six months after a breach. On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > is it data if it's outlying readings? And do you *know* this is what the > university said, or are you summarizing someone else's summary?? > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> the data in question? yes, it was covered. the university has already >> acknowledged that they violated the law. >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dana wrote: >> >> > >> > do we know that this data is? I rather question that, actually. Actually, >> I >> > question whether it is data, period. >> > >> > >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311337 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
