On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:32 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Personally, I'm curious about the motivation. > > Apparently it's money? At least that's what Sam keeps pushing as > motivation. Guess these scientists would all get raises or something? > Is that how it works, Sam?
All the <strike>skeptics</strike> deniers are in it for the money so they say, why not the ???non-deniers? Or are they too pure? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7078565/UN-climate-chiefs-research-institute-won-grants-after-flawed-predictions-on-glaciers.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703657604575005412584751830.html?mod=googlenews_wsj And we all know Hansen made millions > Yeah, most the scientists I know are in it for the money. > > Yup. > > (not.) > > Or maybe that's all that makes the world go round? > > I prefer the sex, the drugs, and the rock and roll, myself. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311351 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
