An interesting analysis of the crash by the author of Columbine:
http://www.slate.com/id/2245337/pagenum/all

jurisprudence
Seven Deadly Traits
Decoding the confession of the Austin plane bomber.
By Dave Cullen
Posted Friday, Feb. 19, 2010, at 6:51 PM ET

Joseph Stack spent months on his manifesto. He was adamant about
convincing us—or himself—why flying his plane into an IRS building was
an act of charity.

The five-page rant the software engineer wrote before his performance
murder is illogical, hysterical, hyperbolic, and deeply dishonest.
Stack's convoluted arguments explain nothing, and the thumbnail sketch
of his impoverished life is absurd. And that's exactly why it's so
revealing. The software engineer tried to con us with a deceptive
self-portrait, but the real Joseph Stack reveals himself in the way he
concocts it.

I've spent 11 years studying routes to mass murder, in particular for
a book on the Columbine school shootings, and it's startling how
similar all the manifestos sound. Many of Stack's passages were
practically lifted right out of the diatribes of Eric Harris, the
Columbine mastermind. Yet while the notes are the same, the tune is
not. Harris was a textbook psychopath, and Stack doesn't read that way
at all. Stack has more empathy, less callousness, and none of the
vicious desire to torment others for enjoyment. There are echoes of
Virginia Tech killer Cho Seung-Hui here, but Stack forms coherent
thoughts and speaks rationally. He gives no indication of insanity.
Instead, Stack shares Oklahoma City bomber Tim McVeigh's disgust with
intrusive government and Unabomber Ted Kaczynski's angry frustration
at "the system."

Each of those killers were driven by different motives. Yet they
shared hallmark traits of a man headed off the rails. I spoke with
several experts in mass murder Thursday, and we identified seven
deadly traits of impending danger in Stack's manifesto.

Narcissism/egocentricity: Joseph Stack ended his life with a supreme
act of narcissism, and that quality leaps out of every line of his
rationalization. It's all about him. Through 30 years of his torture,
"thieves, liars and self-serving scumbags" in Congress continually
targeted Stack personally. The IRS and his own accountant joined in to
make him their personal whipping boy. When the Senate redrew the tax
code in 1986, "they may as well have put my name right in the text of
section (d)," Stack writes.

Grandiosity: Stack's grievances are wildly overblown and his swipes at
powerful institutions grand and hyperbolic: "the vulgar, corrupt
Catholic Church . . . monsters of organized religion," "thugs and
plunderers" in corporate boardrooms driven by "gluttony and
overwhelming stupidity" committing "unthinkable atrocities." More
comical is Stack's portrait of his own misery. As a fuller, objective
emerges, we're likely to see more dramatic chasms between reality and
his depictions, but the contradictions are already comical. Stack
likens his plight to an elderly woman in the neighborhood living on
cat food. He doesn't mention eating it in the cockpit of his private
plane. In Stack's version, he lived and died a pauper. In real life,
he amassed a series of businesses, a $230,000 home in an affluent
community, and the airplane he crashed into the building.

Martyr/injustice collector: Killers like Stack love to project
themselves as martyrs, but that thinking often emerges from a long
history of collecting injustices, while ignoring his ever-growing
wealth. Big Brother "strips my carcass," Stack complains. His
antagonists are merciless: "[A]s usual, they left me to rot and die."
He complains that the 1986 tax revision might as well as "directly
declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave."

Superiority masking self-loathing (projection): Stack lashes out at
"the incredible stupidity of the American public": "brainwashed"
"zombies" who follow along dutifully, incapable of his keen insights
to look right through the horror of "the real American nightmare."
It's a feeble claim of superiority, when the entire treatise reeks of
self-loathing. Stark ends with an attack on capitalism—"From each
according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed." But
this is not a man who rejected the system. He only rejected the idea
of paying his taxes. He spent his life creating businesses, working
the system, and constantly keeping score with his bank balance. Stack
embraced capitalism and then convinced himself he was a dismal failure
at it.

There is a strong hint of projection in Stack's thinking. When he
complains of moving to a better life in Austin and discovering "a
place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance," he might as
well be describing the document he's composing. Projection is common
among depressed people, who take a personal trait they despise in
themselves and apply it to something external to bat around and
ridicule. The televangelist who decries immorality in the midst of an
affair is a classic example. It looks to us like conscious hypocrisy,
but it's really just a dirty little reusable tool for him to beat up
on his own sins.

Isolationist thinking: This served as an aggravating factor for Stack.
He presents himself as battling a monolithic series of adversaries:
big business, big government, Big Brother, big religion. He sees
himself as a shrunken David unable to match this Goliath. There is a
suggestion of paranoia here. Stack is a supremely unreliable narrator
of his own story, but he does seem to have created real financial
hardship for himself. When he repeatedly chose not to pay his taxes,
one or more of his business licenses was suspended.

That seems to be at the heart of Stack's whole mess. Unnamed, but
ever-present in his commentary, is his immersion in a fringe group or
groups who believed they were exempt from the federal income tax. By
his account, Stack devoted enormous time, energy, and possibly money
to this cause.

Stack made some awful choices on his taxes, but surrounding himself
with like-minded zealots may have been just as dangerous in the long
run. In his insightful FBI study "The Lethal Triad," Dr. Kevin
Gilmartin describes intellectual isolation as a key factor when
extremists lash out violently. It's counterintuitive, but joining
certain groups can be more isolating than living alone. Stack found a
group that encouraged and validated the idea of avoiding taxation,
which might have been difficult for him to sustain on his own. The
moral support he found appears to have helped him sustain a rather
nutty concept for 20 to 30 years, in spite of the economic distress it
inflicted on him.

Construing selfishness as selflessness: Stack needed a coping
strategy, a rationalization for his financial failure. He found one in
patriotism. Sure, it may look like greed to keep 100 percent of your
paycheck, but Stack was doing it all for us! And, oh, the price he
paid. "That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of
my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0."

Helplessness/hopelessness: Joseph Stack committed both homicide and
suicide this week, but all the signs point to suicide as the driver.
The FBI trains hostage negotiators to look for two clear signals that
a perpetrator is likely to do himself in. Helplessness is the sense
that I can't get things to work out. Hopelessness sets in when that
belief becomes permanent: The helplessness is here to stay. Stack's
manifesto reeks of both. He felt powerless and took control in the
only way he knew he could "win." He was pretty sure that if he crashed
that plane his life would end. He just needed a way to justify it.

That's where the first four symptoms—narcissism, grandiosity,
superiority, and martyrdom—came back into play. Performance murders
like Stack's are narcissism taken to its worst extreme. Lots of people
will die, most of them innocent, but sorry, I had to kill them to make
my point. It's all about me.

Stack also had the grandiose idea that he was on a mission. "By
striking a nerve," he hopes "the American zombies wake up and revolt."
(Really? Because that's how we have responded to previous acts of
performance murder?) As he wrapped up his manifesto and his life,
Stack returned to the martyr theme. He was ready to make the ultimate
sacrifice, for us.

But there's a problem with this part of the story. Before Stack
crashed the plane, he burned his family out of its home. How to
justify that vindictive act in the diatribe?

Stack just left it out.

Become a fan of Slate on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.
Dave Cullen is the author of Columbine, just released in an expanded
paperback edition. Cullen has contributed to Slate, Salon, the
Washington Post and the New York Times.

Article URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2245337/



On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You don't have to stick the guy into a room and "reprogram" him, that
>> sort does it to themselves. isolate the person (or have them isolate
>> themselves)
>
> Largely a personal decision.
>
>> then restrict information resources and opinions to a very
>> limited set,
>
> Personal decision.
>
>> and reinforce those opinions continually via newsgroups
>> the web etc.,
>
> Personal decisions.
>
>> will have the same effect. In the recent cases like this
>> one, and the shooting in upper New York state last April, the perp was
>> isolated, limited themselves to mostly right wing and similar
>> information sources.
>
> Decisions.
>
>> In other words the brainwashing happened in the
>> open and in the full view of everyone, and frequently with the willing
>> cooperation of the person.  There's a lot more involved than the very
>> limited sketch I've given, but the mechanisms are known and to some
>> extent understood.
>
> Yes they are.  They are called life decisions.
>
> If I make a decision to hang out with criminals all the time, I will
> eventually get into some sort of trouble as a result.  Over time they
> will have modified my perception of normal acceptable behavior.  This
> is why I do not hang out with criminals.  This is called personal
> responsibility.
>
> -Cameron
>
> ..
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312430
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to