It was an NIH-funded study published in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine.
I'm not sure why you're arguing against it unless you didn't read it. It's about a new Abstinence Only program not one of the many existing ones. So it doesn't contradict the earlier findings, it just states it has designed a program that's proven to be effective. I'll put it in Larry speak: It doesn't prove AOE durring the Bush or Clinton years worked so the increase in AIDS cases in DC can still be blamed on Bush. Still doesn't make sense but when did you ever On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > No those were the first few. I have to go through the first 100 > journal articles that use at least a quasi experimental design. The > UPenn study was slightly better than the Heritage foundation > blathering which was the first citation that supported Abstinence, but > it argued from a policy standpoint not a data driven one. But the > overall conclusion is that from just a very cursory glance, the vast > majority found either no improvement, or students in Abstinence only > programs having higher rates of AIDS and std's. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312959 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
