that sounds more plausible, thanks Judah On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > And looking at the actual data table: > > http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/USICE2d0912%20(2)1.pdf > > It looks like there are 18101 with definite immigration holds, meaning > that they are here illegally and 4072 with possible holds, meaning > they are being investigated, out of a total population of 168830. So > that makes it 10.7 percent definitely illegal immigrant and 13.1 > percent probably illegal. Major numbers, though far from 50 percent. > > Judah > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: >> It looks like the current numbers for California are actually about 13% >> >> http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/2010/01/corrections-sta.html >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> "They've had a gang problem in Salinas for decades, according to the news >>> here. That 50% is a bit eye-popping, you sure about that?" >>> >>> Nope. I am not sure. The number came from the Justice Department. It >>> might be too low > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316978 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
