So you are keen to just toss out 112 years of precedent?  I mean, I
could understand your originalist attempts if the Wong ruling was made
by, say, the Warren court. But we are talking about 112 years of
Supreme Court precedence, in a 6-2 decision by Justices that were
alive during the debate and adoption of the 14th Amendment.  You are
relying upon cherry picked quotes of people involved with crafting the
bill which, of course, are not the same thing as the means and
intentions of all the people who voted for adoption of the amendment.
I'm talking about over a century of Supreme court rulings which have
invoked this interpretation of the 14th Amendment, including cases
involving illegal immigration (see Texas, 1982 as referenced earlier).

The US argued in Wong that Wong's parents owed allegiance to the
Emperor of China because they were not US citizens and hence they were
not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. In fact,
Wong's parents could never become citizens, owing to the Chinese
Exclusion Act. In what way are the children of immigrants who cannot
become citizens more subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
than children of illegal immigrants?  That is a very fine hair you
have to split my friend.

It is true that, as far as I know, the Supreme Court has never
explicitly ruled in a case that involved both citizenship (ala Wong)
and illegal immigration (Texas), though Texas obviously referenced
Wong, so I'm sure that sufficiently motivated people can find wiggle
room to carve out an exception that they really really want to see
happen. But that really is the definition of judicial activism.
Roberts is an activist court though, so you very well may get to see
your wish.

Judah

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317040
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to