look, if you aren't going to discuss this in good faith, I have things to do and getting tarred with that brush you are waving around would get in the way of doing them, so... I will say (I think for the fifth time now) that yes yes of course it is a crime and no I don't think it was ok.
I'd appreciate it if you would be careful about the words you put in my mouth, mmkay? I do see a buttload of contributory negligence. Hell, a lot of criminal hubris might be a better way to put it. That pesky public and their right to know how she was spending their money got in her way and she put herself (as well as anyone or anything she was discussing) in harm's way just to evade FOIA. She threw herself to the wolves and the wolf (a pup who might have been tamed) is going to jail. Ok, he's a wolf and shit happens. I understand that part. But she is absolutely not some sort of .... martyr here. OMG. She set her public email account on which she was illegally transacting Alaskan business to be essentially secured with wet toilet paper and STILL does not understand what the problem was. She may not even perceive a problem. It's that hopey changey kinda thing you know? Hope that Alaska has by now implemented a VPN, and this woman will reach a point where looking hurt and bewildered just doesnt work for her anymore Hi there MIB, no, I have no intention of helping that to happen. Scott -- mmm. Later for you. On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just so I understand. > > It's OK to hack into someone's private email account so long as the > person who is getting hacked is stupid when it comes to the security > on that account? > > Regardless of what she did or did not do and regardless of the content > of the email messages that were read, Palin was the victim of a crime. > Period. End of story. > > I find it funny (in a sad way) that you seem to think illegal > immigrants have more rights to 'privacy' than someone who is a former > governor and vice presidential candidate, oh, yea, and American > citizen. > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ok.... in what world does a prospective president circumvent an entire IT >> department trying to prevent exactly this, do so SO THAT SHE CAN EVADE THE >> LAW, and then get to whine? >> >> I don't know what sentence the kid got. I gather it wasn't community >> service. Fine. I disagree but that changes nothing. Moving on. >> >> What really gags me though is that none of this would have happened if miss >> victim had had an ounce of respect for the law or the people she was sworn >> to serve. >> >> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > I do, especially in this case. She testified at his trial and when >>> > they asked her why she chose such an easy-to-guess security question >>> > she said that she wasn't trying to keep the answer secret. Headsmack. >>> > >>> > See my point? >>> >>> If your point is that it should be a crime if a stupid person is the >>> victim, then, yes, I see your point. I do not agree with it, but I see >>> it. >>> >>> -- >>> Scott Stroz >>> --------------- >>> You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can >>> wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris >>> >>> http://xkcd.com/386/ >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317126 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
