I claimed no such thing. I don't know and I don't care. She did however parade him at campaign events, and her pregnant daughter too, the poor kid.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > So because you any many others claimed the child was her daughters she > has no right to privacy? Start the wiretaps. > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We agree there. The stuff he found would not have been usable in >> court. Publishing the business letters might have been a legitimate >> free speech case, but that's not what he did. There's an invason of >> privacy there if you can use such a word for a politican who made her >> Down's syndrome son and teenaged daughter's sex life part of her >> campaign. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317319 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
