We agree there. The stuff he found would not have been usable in court. Publishing the business letters might have been a legitimate free speech case, but that's not what he did. There's an invason of privacy there if you can use such a word for a politican who made her Down's syndrome son and teenaged daughter's sex life part of her campaign.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sure, as long as the evidence is acquired legally. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317302 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
