Aren;t they very closely related? On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Isn't (wasn't) it selective breeding and not genetic engineering? > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Eric Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> It's genetic engineering where instead of nature selecting trait that are >> moved on to the next generation, man did. If it was just domestication, >> then all dogs would still look like wolves. >> >> Eric >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:38 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Thought this was great >> >> >> Is the dogs/wolves example even an example of evolution? Isn't it >> domestication? >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Kris Sisk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >part of the credo of creationism is that all lifeforms are fixed and >> > >unchanging. Ergo no forced and guided evolution is possible. >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > Um....no it's not. It's a matter of macro evolution vs micro evolution. I >> > forget which is which. One is dogs evolving from wolves and the other is >> > birds evolving from dinosaurs. Even the most hard headed Bible literalist >> > creationist doesn't try to tell you that dogs didn't evolve from wolves. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320538 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
