Just because they might not view bio-engineering as 'evolution', does nto mean they cannot excel at it.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > part of the credo of creationism is that all lifeforms are fixed and > unchanging. Ergo no forced and guided evolution is possible. > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I agree that bio-engineering is forced, guided evolution (a great way >> to explain it,m by the way), but that is because I believe in >> evolution. >> >> Just because someone does nto believe that we evolved from other >> creatures does nto mean that they cannot see what we are made up of >> and force and guide changes. >> >> I agree with you guys on the evolution vs. creationism thing, but to >> say you cannot succeed in bio-engineering if you do not believe in >> evolution is kind of short sighted and a bit arogant. >> >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Eric Roberts >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If evolution is false then it shouldn't be possible to genetically modify >>> something to do something else. Really, all bio-engineering is, is forced >>> and guided evolution. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:27 AM >>> To: cf-community >>> Subject: Re: Thought this was great >>> >>> >>> As much as I agree that creationism is pure, unadulterated bullshit, I >>> am nto so sure I agree that Bio-tech would fail because evolution >>> would nto be taught. >>> >>> I am not so sure I undertand the correlation. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> the whole issue of evolution has been discussed so often here and the >>>> creationist point of view has been so roundly rejected on scientific >>>> grounds that I'm not going to discuss this piece of fetid manure. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Kris Sisk <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The red states - through lack of education, development in biotec >>>>>> (hey >>>>>> you need the theory of evolution etc to advance in it, then there's >>>>>> stem cells etc.) I give it maybe 20 years and it will be another 3rd >>>>>> world country ruled by the Christian Taliban. >>>>> >>>>> Eh, wrong on several counts there. >>>>> >>>>> 1) You don't need to understand how life got to the state it's in now to >>> understand what it IS now. Biotech would advance just fine without it even >>> in the unlikely event that evolution got taken out of those schools. >>>>> >>>>> 2) Conservative != Christian >>>>> >>>>> 3) Even if they ended up with a Christian theocracy it wouldn't be like >>> the Taliban. >>>>> >>>>> 4) Neither side would last 20 years before they were third world >>> countries. >>>>> >>>>> The economic ideals of extremists would take care of that in under a >>> decade for BOTH groups. The conservatives would destroy their economy on >>> pointless wars sold to the public as fighting terrorism when in fact the >>> goal is to get more oil. The liberals would destroy thier's with welfare >>> programs run rampant. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320505 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
