no what I am saying is that it is entirely irrelevant to the issue. I do not see how being gay or straight effect economics. Except possibly in your dreams, but we won't go there, its too close to lunchtime and I don't want to put people off their appetite.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> So what does that have to do with the price of tea in china. > > Nothing really, which is what I was pointing it out. > >> In case >> subtlety goes whooshing over your head, per usual, it means whether or >> not those countries are "nearly" bankrupt (which btw they are not) how >> is that relevant to the discussion. > > Australia is the only one not on the verge of bankruptcy from his list. > >> Moreover, you know that Canada has many of the same values as >> Australia etc, and they are definitely not anywhere near bankrupt. > > Are you saying gay or unmarried politicians are better economists? > We're back to tea in China. Do you think there's a direct correlation > with not being bankrupt and not being married? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322209 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
