No. As if to imply that the sexual orientation of marital status of these leaders are of NO CONSEQUENCE to their ability to do their jobs. And also that the majority of the population of these countries see it as such. They don't care. Their media does not splash this across their front page, or talk for weeks or months about it.
That's the implication, and the point. On 29 June 2010 13:52, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > Then Gel goes on to add this: > "well actually things seem to be going relatively well in those countries." > > As if to imply homosexual and/or unmarried leaders create a better > place to live despite the failing forces of the God fearing nations. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322225 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
