On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ian Skinner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/29/2010 9:25 AM, Sam wrote: >> Gel is the one that tied it in not me. I was just pointing out the >> flaw in his argument > > No, I believe you are pointing out how you have misunderstood his argument.
Correction: Ian misunderstood teh argument. > I read his post as these countries don't throw out good public office > holders just because they don't meet some unrelated Puritan ideal. It's > not that having these relationships made them good economists. That > being a good economist they have been allowed to do a good job in spite > of these relationships. This line blows up your logic: Julia Gillard, the _NEW_ Prime Minister of Australia Then Gel goes on to add this: "well actually things seem to be going relatively well in those countries." As if to imply homosexual and/or unmarried leaders create a better place to live despite the failing forces of the God fearing nations. His connecting the dots made absolutely no sense and I for one was proud to point out how ridicules it w ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322223 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
