It's not the positions that are dishonest. It's how the two sides talk about each other. If they were honest they'd both admit that the other side has a point and we'd actually be able to move towards resolving the issue instead of just endlessly arguing about it.
-----Original Message----- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:31 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Ummm, about that budget . . . What isn't honest about those positions? On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Sisk, Kris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Neither side is in the least measure honest or objective. Most who > advocate the end of welfare simply feel that it's not the government's > place to run what amounts to a charity that we're all required to donate > to by law (and they have a point). Most who say we need Medicare simply > feel that the government has an obligation to help take care of those > who can't take care of themselves (and they have a point). > > Personally I think the sensationalism and name calling on both sides is > a bigger danger to our society than the issue itself. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:322747 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
