I don't have the time to continue this conversation, but the only reference I could find is that I mentioned the hypocracy of it when you find it perfectly acceptible to engage in personal attack but take exception wwhen are handled the same.
-- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:05 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > Sorry Larry, even Beth remembers that one. I don't save my > email from this list as we have a quota here. > > <cf_snip_from_Beth> > This liberal pansy felt strongly that Larry calling you a > conservative asshole was completely uncalled for, but I do > recall in the conversation the name calling went both ways, no? > </cf_snip_from_Beth> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:00 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > I never called you such. Please produce the email in full > quote. Do not put > words into my mouth. > > -- > Larry C. Lyons > ColdFusion/Web Developer > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > EBStor.com > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > tel: (703) 393-7930 > fax: (703) 393-2659 > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > http://www.pacel.com > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > -- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:34 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > I wasn't saying you were stating your political ideology, but > > rather you seem to tear down people and yell at them when the > > make fun of or call someone a name, such as a "liberal > > pansy". I didn't see you yell at Larry when he called me a > > "conservative a**hole". I am just pointing out your > > inconsistencies in regards to who you yell at, and they all > > happen to be cases where a person who has a conservative view > > point calling someone with a liberal view point a name or > > criticizing their ideology in a manner you deem rude or > > crude, rather than in all cases, which to me seems hypocritical. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:58 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > Kevin- > > > > I was not stating my political ideology. > > > > Nate appears to be new to the list. > > > > I was careful in my post to Nate to point out the > > divergent views on the list and the tradition of not > > calling names. > > > > If you want to call me a hypocrite, you are entitled to > > your opinion. I am entitled to mine. > > > > -Ben > > > > > Ben, > > > > > > ostracize > > > > > > v 1: expel from a community or group [syn: banish, ban, > > shun, cast out, > > > blackball] > > > > > > 2: avoid speaking to or dealing with; "Ever since I spoke > > up, my colleagues > > > ostracize me" [syn: ostracise] > > > Source: WordNet � 1.6, � 1997 Princeton University > > > > > > I seem to remember that when I called Larry a particular > > name you said you would > > > no longer read any of my emails. Please read number 2 > from above. > > > > > > Once again, I question who you "call out" when a particular > > name is leveled > > > against someone who shares your political ideology. If you > > really mean what you > > > say you would act out accordingly when the shoe is on the > > other foot and someone > > > who shares your ideology levels a name at someone who doesn't. > > > > > > PS Since you are so good at looking up words in the > > dictionary, try this one: > > > hypocrite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:30 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > Kevin- > > > > > > Main Entry: os�tra�cism > > > Pronunciation: '�s-tr&-"si-z&m > > > Function: noun > > > Date: 1588 > > > 1 : a method of temporary banishment by popular vote > > > without trial or special accusation practiced in ancient > > > Greece > > > 2 : exclusion by general consent from common privileges > > > or social acceptance > > > > > > I am not ostracizing anyone. > > > > > > I have not sought banishment or exclusion of Nate, I > > > asked him not to call names. > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > Ben, > > > > > > > > I think we both know, that the name calling has gone both > > ways on this > > > > list. I myself have been guilty of it, however I have > > yet to see you > > > > ostracize someone when the person guilty of the name calling was > > > > pointing it in the direction of someone with a more > > conservative view > > > > point. > > > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:17 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > > > Nate- > > > > > > > > Where do you get off calling names ("pansy liberals")? > > > > > > > > We have a strong tradition on this list of agreeing to > > > > disagree, but respecting each others' opinions. > > > > > > > > Some of the people on this lists are liberals, some are > > > > moderates, some are conservatives. > > > > > > > > We have some lively discussions, but not name-calling. > > > > > > > > Also, your venting might benefit from use of a spell > > > > checker. > > > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > Regardless, charges would need to be brought forward > > for such a case > > > > to be > > > > > brought to court. If consensual, who is filling the charges ? > > > > > > > > > > Your parents against your gf or bf ? I guess you > > should have payed > > > > more > > > > > attention to their rules. Also - likely this would be > > dropped, and if > > > > not - > > > > > sentanced with a probation or community service, as > > minors wouldn't be > > > > > charged as adults for such an act. > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Beth F" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:22 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: Librals Suck ~ lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm, how old where you and your girlfriend when > > ....? Both over > > > > 18? > > > > > > > Even if it was consensual, I presume it was :), was > > it legal? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most states in the US have a consensual age of 16. > > This means that > > > > an > > > > > adult > > > > > > can't have sex with anyone under this age legally. It > > does NOT mean > > > > that > > > > > two > > > > > > 14 year olds doing it is illegal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
