On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Phillip Vector <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would not be willing to assume all cops are bad as default... Kris would, and that is my point. Here is a snippet from earlier in the thread, the first part is from me, the response is from Kris. >> I guess 'innocent until proven guilty' only covers those who are suspected of having committed a crime but not those who would arrest those suspects? >Pretty much, yeah. > > I would be willing to be worried about answering a question of "Do you > drink and drive" from a police officer. I'd be worried if I was asked that question by anyone. > > See the difference? It's ok to be cautious when talking to the police > (or anyone).. But it's not ok to assume every cop is bad and > therefore, out to get you. I do, and I agree with your point. However, for a good portion of his replies, Kris seems to be of the opinion that the only way to protect your rights is to assume all cops are bad until proven otherwise. -- Scott Stroz --------------- You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris http://xkcd.com/386/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:327511 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
