On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:51 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote: > > They also use "network" without adding "cable" quite often.
I never heard that, but I trust you watch it enough to be in the know. > Don't they have a website too? Yeah , it's not doing so well. http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=2345 But it's doing better than the folks on the cable channel that complain they aren't MSM. BTW, I don't think people go to Foxnews.com to tread transcripts of Becks show. > You pulled 1% out of yer anus. I like how you change the "facts" to > fit your arguments though. Classy. =) I didn't. I showed you the numbers and assumed you would remember them. I see now I have to repost. Let's recap. 300 million in the US, about 240 million above 14 years of age. The audience size for an actual news show on Fox News is around 2 million. Special Report with Bret Bear was like 1.9 m last week. If you want to guess how many out of the 240M don't have any access to news, I'll use it to revise my percentages. > If you don't think it's mass media, maybe you should edit that wiki entry. Why are you so concerned with what I think? > Probably because you'll use it being mass media as the basis for some > other argument? Useful! Like one of those jackets you can wear > inside out. Because I'm the one that does that, not you. ;) >> Willl stated it was ironic Fox, Beck, etc. > So you did know! That's why. Again though, nice definition > switch-up. Helped with your magic math, no? What are you talking about? This might explain why your arguing with your imagination. What exactly do you think Will meant verses what I meant? > You remind me of how Apple/Steve Jobs does addition. Like a politician. You know posting that is only going to cause trouble. I hope nobody saw it. > Why? Is O'Reilly Beck, Fox, & c.? Is "Beck, Fox etc" code for something? Something to so with that loser song? That was MSM, for a few days. > Talk about sidetracked. I can see why you're doing it though. =) Yer right my bad. Ignore the above comment. > Dude, percents are AWESOME! Awesome used to mean something really special, now having beer in your bottle when you though it was empty is awesome.Watered down word if you know what I mean. > Sadly, Fox is still part of the MSM. If you insist. Are you going to beat this horse until I agree or can you move on now? > Did Will claim that KO was *not* part of the MSM? Can we try to stay > focused here? I'm high on drugs and easily distracted. I'm not following. Did you over analyze this to a point where I will need to smoke a fat one to figure out where you're coming from? >> Well when people prop the ass up like some kind of successful hero I >> need to splash a little reality on them. > No, you just need to bring your enemies low, principles be damned. > "Damn KO, and damn the torpedoes!" He's not my enemy. Actually I don't have any enemies. I'm awesome that way. >> After the first paragraph my eyes revolted. > Lots of good things are surrounded by stuff that ain't. Take the > Bible, for instance. When I read CNN and it's starts out like that piece did I never find good nuggets. > No, you're making up this one thing, to battle this other thing, which > you also made up. You are fuc3ing with me. > I *love* different opinions. =) So you can mock them? > The problem with Mass Media, especially Fox News, is it seems to be > more about pushing Mass Hysteria, than information. Some times when we're going the wrong way, someone has to sound the alarm. I know you're cumfy with the current disaster, but most of us want to fix it rather than sitting back and trusting the community organizer to get us through this rough patch. Doesn't make them bad, just concerned. > There are some general exceptions, like PBS. Although PBS is > interesting, because it's not all the same content. My local PBS > station could have quite different shows than your local PBS station, > for instance. They all have a great selection to choose from though. > Quality programming. =) You do realize the difference between local and national? The national is the same. > http://en-us.nielsen.com/content/nielsen/en_us/insights/rankings/television.html No news listed. Maybe because the big three aren't grouped together. > Guess even as entertaining as "the news" has go ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:331448 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
