On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:22 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Or maybe since they get like, what? Surely *billions* of dollars in >>> funding-- LOL! I can't type it with a straight face! >> Are you propping up my argument for me so you'll have something to beat down? > No? I don't think so. Maybe subconsciously? You never know... > consciousness is some funky stuff. I'm not arguing how much money they receive, I'm more concerned with accountability then removing funding. Now with both morons at the top gone maybe they will do a better job representing everyone. > I was trying to make a point, using sarcasm. Way for congress (and > lots of other folks) to stay focused. I was pointing out it was a different point from a different time so you should stay focused. > This is *sooooooooo* important! <--- sarcasm > > (if you believe that it is the liberals, and things like NPR, which > make up the shadowy conglomerate screwing us over, maybe it seems more > important?) I don't remember making those accusations. But I know when you read my mind that's what you got. >> I did point out that emailing what they believed to be a terrorist >> organization that you'll hide the money is a shady outfit. I'm sure if >> I tried that it would jam up my clearance. > Spin is an awesome thing. Hard to pass that off as spin. There's an email. > I'm sure they are the first organization that accepts donations from > folks, to be asked if folks can donate anonymously, and the tax > ramifications. Ah, so let's water it down until it passed off as the norm. > You actually see this as "really alarming" and an "emergency" for the country? Nope. Your mind reading skills need more work. > I liked your link from this stuff to a bias in the media, and > terrorists, though. Totes awesome! [golf clap] I made it all up, it's imaginary. > "Be afraid! Be *very* afraid!" > > Personally, I'm more fearful of the effects of greed, and having so > much power and money in so few hands. (Though obviously, the *real* > power is in our hands --we the people-- but sadly we're distracted > easily) Did you lose your place again? Or, are you saying I should look away while you find things wrong with people I support? > Frankly, I think there are far more alarming things to be alarmed about. So you are. > Hey, let us team up on saying how fucked up the new IP stuff coming > down the pipe is! Unless you think the .gov being able to legally spy > on it's citizens is a matter of national security & a good thing... > [insert fond memories of the wiretapping discussion] No knew material yet? > Since it's "Obama" (and the FBI, I guess?) who's doing it, I'd think > we'd be able to team up in decrying it. ;) I'm starting to find it hard to believe Obama's responsible for anything. > Naw. I'm not diametric. I was just poking fun about this EMERGENCY > stuff regarding NPR. I mean, come on. Seriously? SERIOUSLY? pfft. Wasn't me. > Obama hasn't surprised me. I had hope, for something even better, but > whatever. He hasn't disappoint me as much as Bush, who, I might add, > *did* surprised me, but not in the good way. Wow, that shocks me. No really. Is it that you like watching him play golf? > I say we team up with the EFF. Your side, my side, (or whatever we > represent) as one. Let's get together. > > Baby steps. Eventually we'll tackle regulations/campaign reform, etc.. Let's wo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335303 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
