On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:49 PM, denstar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah. Well that's fine. I think there are laws for such things, but
> law is such a messed up area...
And board of directors.
> Don't get me wrong, we've got a pretty awesome system, but it could
> still use a bit of work. =)
Obviously
> Oh. I thought we were talking about how alarming this NPR stuff is.
> Seems like if it should "really alarm" me, calling it an emergency
> isn't so funny.
Is that you're doing? Playing with one word and making the whole point moot?
> LOL! It was only so long ago that the thread hasn't split, so it's
> just a matter of scrolling up, if you're in a threaded view.
Well if he thinks it's so so much ado about so so little maybe an
alarm bell would wake him up.
> This proves the biased nature of NPR? You linked it to the state of
> the news in the nation and Nazis...
You wandered again. What links? Are you now claiming they aren't
biased or that you like the bias?
> Biased towards money, I guess you meant?
I think they confessed that they thought conservatives were idiots or
something like that.
Elitist shit that seems to make you proud. You are Ivy League right?
> My point was that there's probably lots of emails like this out there.
> It's shady business, no doubt, but an EMERGENCY? And just for NPR?
> Do you also believe that public broadcasting is vital to national
> security? You sorta poo-pooed the idea when Gruss mentioned it, I
> think.
Again with they aren't guilty because others probably do it? Didn't
you just mention laws and what not?
>> Ah, so let's water it down until it passed off as the norm.
>
> That's not what I was aiming for, but is the opposite of that better?
But it is. You're saying it's so so ado about so so nothing.
> Is it *really* something to be *really* alarmed about? Call an
> emergency session to pass a bill that's not aimed towards actions like
> this in general, but NPR specifically?
What? Did I ask for that? Isn't the budget an emergency and isn't that
part of the budget?
> Did I imagine you telling Gruss it should really alarm him?
I was talking to Gruss who at the time was excusing it is much ado
about so so...
> pretty sure you used alarm a couple of times, and said how they love
> them some terr'ists
Yeah, I'm pretty sure accepting money from known terrorist
organizations is illegal.
> (forgetting for a moment the deal about being
> scared to fly with folk on airplanes-- I know! /that's/ why they
> fired that dude! Cuz they loves teh terrorz!).
I'm not following that. Who?
>> Did you lose your place again? Or, are you saying I should look away
>> while you find things wrong with people I support?
> It doesn't have to be either/or, you know. I'm more pointing out
> perspective, or perhaps, a sense of proportion.
We were talking about NPR taking and hiding money from terrorists.
> Is this going to fix the budget? Go a long ways towards fixing the
> budget? Is it /really/ alarming? Is this what we should be focused
> on, right now?
So you're saying we can't discuss anything unless you decide it's worthy enough?
We were discussing. Take another hit and chill out:)
> You say "yes, for real", I say "not so much". More power to you,
> wanting to see justice served, but I don't think it justifies an
> "emergency".
I didn't even thing it was urgent enough to post, but when lies were
bandied about I started adding my 2 cents.
> I guess so, if you want to look at it that way. It's a more polarized
> way of looking at it, I think, but it's basically valid, so what the
> hell!
Should I ask you next time before responding if a topic is worthy of
commenting? Save us all this typing.
>> I'm starting to find it hard to believe Obama's responsible for anything.
> Responsibility is a weird deal. Whole philosophies are devoted to
> sussing out its nature.
Rush said: "if you choose not to decide you still have made a choice"
so I guess voting present carries some responsibility.
> Surely he plays a part, as do we all. No man is an island. ('cept
> sorta, all men /are/ islands-- women too!)
Are you going to go with his picks?
> The whole "this is a big deal, be alarmed about X, and really alarmed
> about Y (terrorists)" seemed sorta like it *was* you.
Can I call you Harpo?
> I haven't confused you with the GOP. =)
They were cutting them anyway, this just gives them more ammo.
> I'm sure all the gray hair is from the back nine. I hear it's a doozy!
What's he done besides Obamacare which he didn't even do?
> Do you want me to say he's an evil bastard because he's done what I
> predicted he'd do, as far as giving power back to the people? I don't
> know that it's his to give... I'm super glad Bush set so many awesome
> examples for future presidents though!
If you predicted the misery index for America to be this high and are
glad you were correct than you suck. Just saying.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzs8TPyv3QI
I'm so glad I don't h
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:335306
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
