Enough so that the net sum of tourist dollars pays for an entire family to live extremely lavish lives and have sub-$100 million weddings?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Erika L. Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > I hate to go against your goals, but the royal family is responsible for a > very large amount of tourism dollars. > > That's their job now. Tourism draw. > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Ray Champagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Seriously, what the frock does England get from a Queen these days? > Seems > > to my unapologetic American eyes that the country is wasting > approximately > > $62 million on a wedding for a royal family that has approximately zero > to > > do with any policies, laws or procedures. Why is there such a thing as a > > Queen in Western society in 2011 anyways? Go get a job, you expensive > > freeloading bums. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:336914 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
