On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Michael Dinowitz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That's the problem. He's saying that the basis is the 67 line and swaps are >> from there. At no place nor time was the basis the 67 line. The Oslo accord >> never said it. UN resolution 242 never said it. Neither Bush nor Clinton >> said it. The basis was always secure borders with land being given for >> peace. What land was the question and that was the point of negotiations. >>
I think the 67 lines are significant due to the sinking of USS Liberty during that war. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:338204 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
