To be absolutely, positively, Colorado mountain stream, crystal clear: my
intent is not to justify his joke.  It was stupid, crude, in extremely bad
judgment and probably harmful for the reasons G states in his summary of
view points.  I neither condone racism nor racist jokes.  If you actually
read what I said, before letting your emotions obscure my words you would
note the following things:

   1. I said I don't follow Rush so am not up to date on
   every insensitive thing he has said.
   2. I tried to make it clear that my viewpoint was from the perspective of
   this incident because ... (see point #1).
   3. At no point did I say Rush is not racist, rather I suggested that
   making a racist comment doesn't make one a racist.
   4. I was not being combative in any way, shape nor form until you decided
   condescension makes an effective form of persuasion.

If he has a history of bigoted behavior, he probably is just as you claim,
but as per point #1, I can't speak to that nor have I tried.  I simply don't
think a bad comment defines a person (see point #1). For instance, you
indirectly calling me a racist doesn't necessarily make you an a--hole.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is it prejudicial? Yes. I'm prejudiced against racism and people who
> are apologists for racists.
>
> Judah


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:341713
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to