> Given the history of pharmaceuticals, it is foolish for anyone to proclaim a > drug safe when it has only been in use for a few years and there is no > long-term data available about the health risks associated with it.
So, Robert, how does one acquire the "long-term data" you seek? At what point are your personal testing requirements satisfied? 35 million doses administered and 32 deaths, none of which were attributable to the vaccine. Placebo rates of side effects and "death" equivalent to the actual drug. So people who got *nothing* died at the same rate as those that got the vaccine. You seem to be looking at data and repudiating it because you *feel* there must be something wrong. -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342147 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
