There is a very big issue here I see, this study had a sample size of under 40 participants. For this sort of study that is nowhere near enough to give these results any statistical power. It's such a small blip on the extreme edge of the population curve, that you cannot really generalize from it. It needs an independent replication with a larger sample.
>long term data = watch and wait > >As for studies of safety, see this report: > >http://home.comcast.net/%7Etarsell/report0526.pdf > >In the report you see that the authors acknowledge the limitations of their >own study and point out that the FDA has acknowledged limitations in their >own study. In other words, data is incomplete. A known unknown. > >Mandating any vaccine surrounded by such uncertainty seems unwise. At the >end of the day, the issue is about freedom of choice, the choice to weigh >risks and benefits for yourself and your family. Why mandate a vaccine for >an STI that can be avoided by personal choices about sexual behavior? Just >doesn't make sense. > > >On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, William Bowen <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> You seem to be looking at data and repudiating it because you *feel* >> there must be something wrong. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342153 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
