On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not sure I agree with that. Science is only after the explainable. If it > truly can't be explained, there's not really much for science to do. > > Perhaps you meant to say "unexplained", instead of "unexplainable"? I guess you could say unexplained. Or currently beyond our ability to explain. -Cameron ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342454 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
