IIRC, an appeals court up in the frozen tundra somewhere (MINN? WISC?) ruled that there was no law broken when a husband installed a gps tracker on his estranged wife's car to help him stalk her.
So why shouldn't the gubbermint be able to stalk people? (hate, hate, hate Obama on this topic. He is as bad as anyone in US history on the removal of personal liberty and privacy) On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Ras Tafari <[email protected]> wrote: > > radio shack. > $22 > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> "The Obama administration will be defending the warrantless use of such > >> trackers in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning. The > >> administration, which is attempting to overturn a lower court ruling > that > >> threw out a drug dealers conviction over the warrantless use of a > tracker, > >> argues that citizens have no expectation of privacy when it comes to > their > >> movements in public so officers dont need to get a warrant to use such > >> devices." > >> > > > > Hmmm.......in a sense that's true...once you step out your door, you are > > basically in public view and who knows who is watching, when, where or > how. > > > > BUT...your car is your personal property, no matter where you take it, > and > > people...or the government...shouldn't be allowed to tamper with it. > > > > -- > > I don't know what I was on > > But I think it grows in Oregon > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343981 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
