So its OK if it costs a certain amount?

let me guess you have shares in Haliburton and Bechtel. by that logic
as long as it costs a lot then its constitutionally permissible?

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:52 AM, PT <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What is
>  > the difference here.
>
> The ease of which it can be done.
>
> If the FBI is going to assign 100 agents to tail you, they obviously
> have singled you out for something serious.  Those 100 agents represent
> a large amount of resources.
>
> Now they can just shove a $50 tracker under your bumper and call it a
> day.  At that price, why not use them whenever possible, even for no
> good reason?  Who knows, they might get lucky and catch you doing
> something they can bust you for and get their $50 worth at least ..
> something that has absolutely no relevance to why the tracker might have
> been placed to begin with.  With no warrant specifying what they are
> after, anything they find is fair game.
>
> -----
> "Because I can lie beautiful true things into existence ..."
> Neil Gaiman on Why I write.
>
> On 11/9/2011 11:37 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> Remember too the police don't need a search warrant to search a car,
>
> I don't think this is universal.  If it is, it shouldn't be.  If I am
> pulled over for a "broken tail light", there is no reason anyone needs
> to look in my trunk.
>
>> even though it is private property. You're in public so there should
>> be little or no expectation of privacy. The GPS issue is the same as
>> if the FBI had details 100 agents to follow the guy around. What is
>> the difference here.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343987
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to