Remember too the police don't need a search warrant to search a car, even though it is private property. You're in public so there should be little or no expectation of privacy. The GPS issue is the same as if the FBI had details 100 agents to follow the guy around. What is the difference here.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> "The Obama administration will be defending the warrantless use of such >> trackers in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning. The >> administration, which is attempting to overturn a lower court ruling that >> threw out a drug dealers conviction over the warrantless use of a tracker, >> argues that citizens have no expectation of privacy when it comes to their >> movements in public so officers dont need to get a warrant to use such >> devices." >> > > Hmmm.......in a sense that's true...once you step out your door, you are > basically in public view and who knows who is watching, when, where or how. > > BUT...your car is your personal property, no matter where you take it, and > people...or the government...shouldn't be allowed to tamper with it. > > -- > I don't know what I was on > But I think it grows in Oregon > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343985 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
