bummer...in my calc classes in college we used the rate of change to
determine time of death for a corpse. I also remember using the prime
vector.....crap, what was the name of that thing.....gradient! Using the
gradient to locate the center of gravity in a 747.

Pretty cool, and helped keep us interested. Those real world examples had
to be dumbed down a bit of course (didn't have to consider other factors
for the corpse, for example), but it was still cool.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I think hit the nail with your head.
>
> Its not so much that kids are taught stuff they cannot use in the
> 'real world', but rather they are not shown real world examples of
> where they would need to sue what they are learning.
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Justin Scott <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> You can't go back 10 or 20 or 30 years later and expect
> >> to do well on any of these tests.
> >
> > Indeed, and I think that was the point.  Out of all his experience as
> > an adult outside of school, he never had to use any of those skills so
> > they got rusty or were lost to time.  If he never had to use those
> > skills, even with all of the responsibilities he has, what's the point
> > of teaching them in the first place?
> >
> > As a "veteran" programmer, one of the things I tell newer developers
> > is to review the tag/function/method reference from time to time.  Not
> > to memorize the whole thing, or to know every argument to every
> > function, but just to be aware of what is available.  If you have a
> > specific problem to solve, you can go back to the reference for the
> > details later, just be aware that it's there.
> >
> > One of the favorite questions in math classes (at least for me) was
> > "what are we going to use this for later in life?"  The teachers would
> > see this as a smart-ass comment and give a smart-ass response like,
> > "you need it to pass the test at the end of the semester."  I don't
> > think I ever once got an actual example of a practical application of
> > much of what we were being taught.  They focused so much on theory and
> > specifics that they skipped over practical application entirely
> > (more-so with math, but in other areas as well).
> >
> > My belief is that if schools toned down the theory and specifics and
> > focused more on real life examples of problems and solutions then we'd
> > be better off.  Let the kids know what tools are available to them and
> > show them how to apply those tools to real problems they will face in
> > life.  Rather than test on solving quadratic equations, test on which
> > equations or problem-solving techniques should be used in which
> > situations.  If they ever have a need to use any of those tools later
> > on, references are readily available.
> >
> >
> > -Justin
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:344287
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to