Also according to what I have read, there was no tech industry input, only input from groups like the MPAA.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Scott Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is the crux of the whole protest. It's not about supporting piracy, > its about a badly written dangerous piece of legislation that would > effectively break internet security and in the long term cost thousands of > tech jobs. > > There are two types of people that should never ever make IT decisions: > accountants and congressmen. > On Jan 17, 2012 3:02 PM, "Cameron Childress" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I think that you can be against SOPA and still be for property and content >> rights. The assumed goals of SOPA are mostly not as foul as the misguided >> way they are trying to go about it. >> >> -Cameron >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jacob <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I thought Obama said yesterday that he will not support SOPA? >> > >> > I am in between... I am for free internet, etc..., but I am sick of those >> > that pirate our content and make it available for download for free. >> Since >> > all of them are out of the country, we are screwed and lose revenue >> because >> > of it. The industry I am in has suffered because of stolen content now >> > available on all the porn tube channels. >> > >> > >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345442 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
