I continue to not understand the data debate; visually we can see enough. Sam keeps saying he favors collective action, and that he's posted all about it, but I've never seen a single recommendation for collective action from him.
Further, we continue with lots of data posts; who cares? We're never going to prove it so why not move on to the action question? that's where Sam and others seem to go dark. Watch, I'll show you: Sam please post 3 short bullets on what collective actions you think humans should be taking on GW. On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > what she said > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Read the thread. Didn't see anything that wasn't tainted by either >> the funding behind the group posting it or the absolute insanity of >> the claimant. >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'll let you finish reading the thread. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Do you have any links that aren't paid for by the industries what >>>> would profit from continuing to cut down trees and pollute the >>>> environment? >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345851 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
