I think it is Ironic that the American criminologist is from a town called
Battleground and the Canadian guy's last name is Mauser...

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> NO I went to their website and then went to a couple of charity
> watchdog sites, such as
>
> http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=10196
>
> and looked them up. I also did the same for the Harvard School For
> Public Health project I cited. That one receives money from the Joyce
> Foundation and the CDC. Last I checked the CDC is not what you'd call
> a liberal organization, except in the minds of some extremist
> conservatives.
>
> Second, I really do not think that a screed published as an op ed
> piece in a student publication has the same weight as multiple studies
> in peer reviewed journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine
> or Public Health. If you think that it does then you're woefully
> ignorant of how this process works for real science, not the pseudo
> science promoted by the right wing.
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > "Always follow the source. The ACRU is a right wing think tank with lots
> of
> > funding from extremely conservative groups. Interesting to see who is on
> > the board:"
> >
> > Sure.  That's why any studies you find promoting gun control are
> > predominately generated by the left.
> >
> > Anyway, here's a link to the actual study published by Harvard Law
> >
> >
> http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
> >
> > Some good excerpts:
> >
> >
> > Since at least 1965, the false assertion that the United States has
> > the industrialized world’s highest murder rate has been an artifact
> > of politically motivated Soviet minimization designed to hide the
> > true homicide rates. Since well before that date, the Soviet Union
> > possessed extremely stringent gun controls
> > that were effectuated by a police state apparatus providing stringent
> > enforcement.
> > So successful was that regime that few Russian civilians now have
> > firearms and very few murders involve them.
> > Yet, manifest success in keeping its people disarmed did not prevent the
> > Soviet
> > Union from having far and away the highest murder rate in the
> > developed world.In the 1960s and early 1970s, the gun‐less So‐
> > viet Union’s murder rates paralleled or generally exceeded those
> > of gun‐ridden America. While American rates stabilized and then
> > steeply declined, however, Russian murder increased so drasti‐
> > cally that by the early 1990s the Russian rate was three times
> > higher than that of the United States. Between 1998‐2004 (the lat‐
> > est figure available for Russia), Russian murder rates were nearly
> > four times higher than American rates. Similar murder rates also
> > characterize the Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and various
> > other now‐independent European nations of the former U.S.S.R.
> >
> > Thus, in the United States and the former Soviet Union transition‐
> > ing into current‐day Russia, “homicide results suggest that wher
> > guns are scarce other weapons are substituted in killings.”
> > While American gun ownership is quite high, Table 1 shows many other
> > developed nations (e.g., Norway, Finland, Germany, France,
> > Denmark) with high rates of gun ownership. These countries,
> > however, have murder rates as low or lower than many devel‐
> > oped nations in which gun ownership is much rarer. For example,
> > Luxembourg, where handguns are totally banned and ownership
> > of any kind of gun is minimal,
> >
> > The same pattern appears when comparisons of violence to
> > gun ownership are made within nations. Indeed, “data on fire‐
> > arms ownership by constabulary area in England,” like data
> > from the United States, show “a negative correlation,” that is,
> > “where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are lowest,
> > and where guns are least dense violent crime rates are high‐
> > est.”
> >
> > ...
> >
> > National Institute of Justice surveys among prison inmates
> > find that large percentages report that their fear that a victim
> > might be armed deterred them from confrontation crimes.
> > “[T]he felons most frightened ‘about confronting an armed
> > victim’ were those from states with the greatest relative
> > number of privately owned firearms.” Conversely, robbery
> > is highest in states that most restrict gun ownership.
> > ...
> >
> > Over a decade ago, Professor Brandon Centerwall of the Uni‐
> > versity of Washington undertook an extensive, statistically sophis‐
> > ticated study comparing areas in the United States and Canada to
> > determine whether Canada’s more restrictive policies had better
> > contained criminal violence. When he published his results it was
> > with the admonition:
> >
> > If you are surprised by [our] finding[s], so [are we]. [We] did
> >
> > not begin this research with any intent to “exonerate” hand‐
> >
> > guns, but there it is—a negative finding, to be sure, but a nega‐
> >
> > tive finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us
> >
> > where not to aim public health resources.
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> > This Article has reviewed a significant amount of evidence
> > from a wide variety of international sources. Each individual
> > portion of evidence is subject to cavil—at the very least the
> > general objection that the persuasiveness of social scientific
> > evidence cannot remotely approach the persuasiveness of
> > conclusions in the physical sciences. Nevertheless, the bur‐
> > den of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal
> > more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, espe‐
> > cially since they argue public policy ought to be based on
> > that mantra.
> >
> > To bear that burden would at the very least
> > require showing that a large number of nations with more
> > guns have more death and that nations that have imposed
> > stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions
> > in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are
> > not observed when a large number of nations are compared
> > across the world
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This link shows a simple google search with tons of results:
> >
> https://www.google.com/search?ix=sea&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=gun+control+crime+rates
> >
> > J
> >
> > -
> >
> > Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad
> reputation.
> > - Henry Kissinger
> >
> > Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel,
> > go out and buy some more tunnel. - John Quinton
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347487
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to