I didn't say that the annexation of Canada wasn't a goal in the minds of
some people.  I said it wasn't a stated goal of the campaign, and it wasn't.

The total debt of the U.S. government is now:

$15,661,574,232,598.82

The total income of the U.S. in 2011 was:

$2,567,181,000,000

So yes our debt is far in excess of our income.

Lets look at the ratios shall we.

34:127 = 3.6onandonandon
vs.
2:15 = 7.5

So who has the worse debt to income ratio their?

Also what was the income in 1815?

Look, we both cultural and national biases here.  However all I am arguing
is that it was a dray, the treaty of Ghent, and the later treaty of Paris,
basically show that.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> jefferson said it was only a matter of marching to conquer Canada. It
> was also the stated aim of the War Hawk faction.
>
> John Adams
> The Unanimous Voice of the Continent is "Canada must be ours; Quebec
> must be taken."
>
> Thomas Jefferson
> The acquisition of Canada this year, as far as the neighborhood of
> Quebec, will be a mere matter of marching, and will give us experience
> for the attack of Halifax the next, and the final expulsion of England
> from the American continent.
> ~1812. In a letter to Colonel William Duane.
>
> Also here are a couple of articles you may find useful.
>
> Stagg, J.C.A. (January 1981). "James Madison and the Coercion of Great
> Britain: Canada, the West Indies, and the War of 1812". William and
> Mary Quarterly 38 (1): 3–34. doi:10.2307/1916855. JSTOR 1916855.
> Stagg, John C.A. (1983). Mr. Madison's War: Politics, Diplomacy, and
> Warfare in the Early American republic, 1783-1830. Princeton, NJ:
> Princeton University Press.
>
> The US navy stronger? It was beached from 1913 on. The Macedonia and
> United States were hulked. the Chesapeake and President were captured.
> Another was destroyed on the blocks before it was captured. Most of
> the east coast was blockaded with British able to strike at will -
> just look at the US response to the Chesapeake campaign, not one US
> warship tried to resist.
>
> And yest at the end of the war the US government was in worse shape
> then than now. The war cost the US $105 million, about the same as the
> cost to Britain. The national debt rose from $45 million in 1812 to
> $127 million by the end of 1815. At the same time American exports
> decreased from $130 million in 1807 to $7 million in 1814. Given that
> the 1812 dollar is worth about 25 times as much as it is now, then
> that is a major issue, especially considering the size of US economy
> was much much smaller than it is now. The impact of the debt and cost
> of the war was proportionately much larger in relation to the economy
> than the current debt, especially considering that the government at
> the time took in less than 34 million in gold in 1814. Last I looked
> the proportion of the US debt to is still far less than the total
> revenues of the US government from all sources.
>
> And yes I did mention the British blockade of the French coasts. I
> take it you have no objection to private corporations trading with
> Iran or North Korea -  its the same objection that the British had at
> the time.
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:15 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Wow, what I'm reading and have read about this conflict in no way
> supports
> > your claims.
> >
> > 1.  It was never the stated American objective to seize Canada.  That is
> > something that Canadians like to say a lot, but it's simply not born out
> by
> > the facts.
> >
> > 2.  The American Navy was stronger at the end of the war than it was at
> the
> > beginning, we went on to fight and win the 2nd Barbary war in 1815 with
> > that Navy, finally breaking the backs of the pirates.
> >
> > 3.  Money was likely one of the main real causes of the war.  Britain had
> > been seizing ships and crew and prohibiting us from trading witht he rest
> > of the European continent.  We were able to resume normal trade after the
> > war.  Objective met, Nyet Comrade?
> >
> > 4.  We were in worse debt than now?  Really Larry, you need to take a
> look
> > at the numbers there my friend, even accounting for inflation the debt
> > incurred in no way matches our current budget, let alone out national
> debt.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:31 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Larry C. Lyons <
> [email protected]
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> they did fight a war a few decades later and the americans got their
> >> >> butts collectively handed to them.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yeah, but we won when it counted!
> >>
> >> Last I checked Canada is still not a part of the US. That is what the
> >> entire war of 1812 was about. When the treaty of Ghent was signed, the
> >> British controlled more US territory than the US controlling Canadian
> >> territory. The American merchant navy was in tatters, the US navy was
> >> up on blocks. The American economy was shattered because of the lack
> >> of trade with Britain, and the government was in worse debt than now.
> >> There was a movement within Britain to continue the war and eliminate
> >> the "American heresy".
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >> >
> >> > Oh there were a lot of what-ifs that could have caused the revolution
> to
> >> > fail. It's still a miracle that we won that war. YOu talk about very
> >> > different treatment of the colonies...do you see any such treatment
> that
> >> > could have resulted in the colonies not attempting another revolution?
> >> >
> >> > It was inevitable, wasn't it?
> >>
> >> Its hard to say. There could have been accommodations and the eventual
> >> change in status from a set of colonies to a Dominion, very much like
> >> what happened in Upper and Lower Canada. At the end of the
> >> Revolutionary war the idea was that it was too much democracy that was
> >> the problem. So the BNA colonies representative legislatures were cut
> >> back severely. It wasn't until the Upper and Lower Canada rebellions
> >> of 1837 and the destruction of the Family Compacts that a more
> >> representative legislature in the BNA Colonies were reestablished.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:350137
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to