Your analogy makes no sense. In the eyes of the federal government, gay couples cannot be 'married', therefore they do not have the same rights afforded to 'married' hetero sexual couples.
Maybe my analogy could be better. Its like letting a gay man sign a lease, but he won't get heat or hot water like the heterosexual man he has as a neighbor. That seems more fitting. On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not at all. It's more like telling a gay man he shouldn't call himself > a heterosexual. > See the difference between denying someone something real vs denying > someone use of a title? > > . > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> To me, it is akin to >> telling a gay man he cannot sign a lease for no other reason than the >> fact that he is gay. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:353274 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
