This explains it: ... Before Republicans broadly agreed upon a strategy of opposing any health reform proposal embraced by President Obama, the party once supported access to healthcare using clinics. The Bush administration requested and received modest increases in federal health clinic funding over the years. Now, however, the GOP has made opposing the entire Affordable Care Act a central plank in its platform, and virtually no lawmakers have been willing to praise it while speaking to the media ...
The only way this logic would make sense is to assume the reason people are against Obamacare is because it funds clinics. Since that is something that existed before Obamacare your entire argument falls flat. Actually it's saying if you don't support Obamacare in it's entirety you have to be against all federal involvement with healthcare. Seems a wee bit biased? . On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > So Ryan wants to squash all of the ACA provisions, according to all > his campaign speeches etc., yet he has no qualms about shilling for > money from the ACA. > > So the hypocrisy is OK from your point of view? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:354510 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
