The democrats violated multiple elections laws all along the way in how the
recount conducted.  Not allowing observers in, not counting valid ballots.

I don't care if you like the guy or not, but he's been treated wrong down
there.


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Allen West (I won't dignify him with titles because he is unworthy of them)
> dropped out because he is a loser. And he lost the election. Repeatedly.
> Every time he got a recount that he wanted, he went further into the hole
> on vote counts and just started screaming "it must be a conspiracy!"
> louder.
>
> Judah
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:40 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > This election was screwed.  LT COL West finally dropped out after seeing
> > how corrupt the recount was.  Go google around and you'll see some crazy
> > first hand accounts of what they were doing.
> >
> > It's pretty crazy.
> >
> > Like all the districts where Obama got 100%.
> >
> > I'm not giving either side more blame here, they are both guilty of
> insane
> > amounts of fraud and intimidation.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 'Steal votes' somehow.
> > >
> > > Cannot help but think, if this is true, is it related to that 'last
> > minute'
> > > update to some OH voting machines.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What are they alleging Rove's system was going to do?
> > > >
> > > > I didnt understand that from the article.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <
> > [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  http://bit.ly/S8UdVM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think (nor do I want to think) Karl Rove would attempt
> what
> > > was
> > > > > > alleged by Anonymous. If this is true (and I don't want it to
> be),
> > it
> > > > > tells
> > > > > > me our system is more flawed than any of us may have imagined.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On the flip side, if it is true, seems Anonymous is trying to 'do
> > > > good'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More than likely it is pure, unadulterated bullshit, but man is
> it
> > > > scary
> > > > > to
> > > > > > think, 'What if it is true?'
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This screams to me as "seriousness of the charge" type accusation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, as one comment in the article says, since "Anonymous" decided
> > to
> > > > > "blow up" the system, it becomes much more difficult for anything
> to
> > be
> > > > > proven.
> > > > >
> > > > > Until Later!
> > > > > C. Hatton Humphrey
> > > > > http://www.eastcoastconservative.com
> > > > >
> > > > > No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large
> > number
> > > > of
> > > > > electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:358598
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to