State's national guard...aka the militia as per the Militia Act of 1903 (aka
the Dick Act)

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:13 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control


In the hands of the police, military and the state's National Guard.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:03 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Right, so you agree then that they can certainly be useful.
> On Jan 10, 2013 10:56 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> because its smaller and less awkward to deal with in enclosed spaces.
>> Notice that they also haul out the shotguns or rifles when needed.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hand gun are not unnecesary.  Why do the military and law 
>> > enforcement
>> carry
>> > them?  Security guards?
>> >
>> > Concealable firearms are in many instances far more useful than 
>> > long
>> guns.
>> > On Jan 10, 2013 10:05 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> OK.
>> >>
>> >> Outlaw the import, sale, manufacture and possession of hand guns.
>> >>
>> >> In the near term, only criminals will have hand guns...the rest of 
>> >> us
>> will
>> >> have shot guns or rifles or whatever brand of assault rifle we see
fit.
>> As
>> >> the years go by, the number of hand guns will decrease to the 
>> >> point
>> where
>> >> they are relatively rare.
>> >>
>> >> I don't pretend that there is any solution that represents a 
>> >> panacea. I just know that hand guns are unnecessary, serve no 
>> >> purpose other than to aid criminals, we'd be better off without 
>> >> them, the status quo is unacceptable, and any short term pain 
>> >> required to make things better in
>> the
>> >> long run...is worth it, in my opinion.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > So, dispute it.
>> >> >
>> >> > .
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Larry C. Lyons <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > can you parrot any other NRA talking point, I mean try for a
>> trifecta
>> >> > > here. Really Sam, ever try for anything original? That 
>> >> > > argument is
>> so
>> >> > > cliched and old that its collecting social security. If that's 
>> >> > > the best you can do why are you here?
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359980
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to